The Audit is for you when
- ✓Recurring manual work is visible, but its true cost is not.
- ✓Several automation ideas compete for budget and attention.
- ✓You need evidence before choosing a tool or implementation.
Calculate your loss in under two minutes. Then, in two weeks, we deliver a clear map of where you're losing time, automations ranked by return on investment — and, with the Full Audit, a working prototype.
Use your own numbers to estimate how much capacity may be tied up in recurring manual tasks. This is directional, not a promised result: the Audit replaces assumptions with observed workflow data.
A payback below one month at the minimum Build investment may indicate that this scope needs a larger implementation budget.
Estimate, not a promise.
Recovered capacity is not automatically cash savings. Financial value depends on whether the time avoids hiring or overtime, or supports additional productive work. The estimate uses your Build and operating costs, implementation period, economic-realization input, and 25% software consolidation. The Audit replaces these assumptions with observed data.
Invoices, purchase orders, receipts — manual data entry and handling.
Leads and follow-ups that slip through the cracks.
Sorting, filing, and routing support requests.
Sync between accounting, CRM, and spreadsheets.
Reports built by hand, week after week.
A decision-maker and the people closest to the selected workflow join the kickoff and validation. We ask for representative examples, current tools, volumes, exception cases, and known constraints. Access is agreed in advance and limited to what the Audit requires.
Included only in the Full Audit, the prototype demonstrates one selected workflow with representative inputs. It is evidence for a decision—not a production deployment. Production hardening, monitoring, security review, migration, service levels, and ongoing support belong to an optional Build agreement.
Yes. Both are planned as two-week engagements from kickoff, subject to timely access to participants and agreed inputs.
Yes, but any follow-on scope and fee are confirmed separately. Express does not include a prototype and its fee is not credited toward a Build.
No. The handover may recommend a Build, a smaller operational change, further investigation, or no automation. You own the decision.
No. Audit outputs are directional estimates based on observed evidence and documented assumptions. Any contractual target exists only in a separately signed Build agreement.
First, we assess your situation together and whether an audit makes sense for you. Book online — that's where it all starts. →
We map your current processes with the people who run them every day.
We identify where time is lost, what's automatable, and estimate recoverable hours — in black and white.
Each opportunity is scored by effort vs. impact. A clear, jargon-free matrix that lets you decide quickly.
With the Full Audit, we build a real automation flow for the first high-impact case — so you see concrete results before investing further.
We present the results, the game plan, and clear next steps.
One targeted process — ideal for a smaller SMB or a first step.
Mapping of multiple processes, plus a working prototype.
Credited in full. If a qualifying Build begins within 60 days, the Full Audit fee is credited in full toward it.
We track manual work task by task and put a number on it — in dollars and hours.
Every automation opportunity is prioritized by what it returns, not by what looks shiny.
No theory: with the Full Audit, a real, running automation that demonstrates the selected workflow before you invest further.
This fictional distribution scenario shows the shape of an Audit deliverable. The company, workflow and numbers are synthetic; none of it is presented as client work.
Northstar Distribution (fictional)
| Opportunity | Impact | Effort / risk | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard order entry | High | Medium | Audit now |
| Weekly operations report | Medium | Low | Consider next |
| Pricing exceptions | High | High risk | Keep human approval |
We observe a representative baseline, validate frequency and loaded labour assumptions, then score each opportunity for impact, feasibility, data quality, operational risk and dependencies. The recommendation may be automate now, investigate later, or do not automate.
We do not recommend end-to-end automation when the process is unstable, the inputs are unreliable, the volume cannot justify the cost, or a judgement call needs clear human accountability.
Book 30 minutes. We look at your processes together and tell you, concretely, where the time is hiding.
No obligation · We reply within 24h