1
Fit the approach to the evidence
We compare existing product configuration, lightweight automation, custom code, and hybrid delivery against the confirmed workflow and constraints.
Build & Implementation
Move from tested idea to dependable production workflow.
Build is an optional, separately scoped stage after the Audit. We select the lightest approach that meets the workflow’s volume, criticality, integration, data, and operating requirements.
Implementation
The right solution — not our favourite tool.
We don't sell a specific tool. After the audit, we recommend the approach that fits your real needs — volume, criticality, integrations, security. Sometimes, the best recommendation is to not build anything custom.
A
Configure what you already have
Off-the-shelf software already does the job? We configure and integrate it — without reinventing or billing unnecessary custom work.
B
Lightweight automation
Simple need, low volume, rules that change often: a quick automation flow, deployed in a few days.
C
Custom
High volume, business-critical, deep integration with your systems: built in code (Laravel, AWS), designed for production.
D
Hybrid
The most common case: a quick prototype to demonstrate value, then we harden the critical core in code.
Starting around $6,000, depending on scope. If a qualifying Build begins within 60 days, the Full Audit fee is credited in full toward it.
How the implementation decision is made
2
Do not build without a justified case
We recommend no Build when the process is unstable, the inputs are unreliable, the volume cannot support the cost, or an existing operational change solves the problem more safely.
3
Price follows production scope
Builds start around $6,000. Scope varies with integrations, data migration, exception paths, security, testing, deployment, documentation, and operating requirements.
Prototype and production are different deliverables
A Full Audit prototype demonstrates one selected workflow with representative inputs. A production Build adds validated integrations, permission design, error handling, logging, monitoring, deployment controls, representative-volume testing, documentation, and an agreed acceptance process.
Acceptance and guarantee conditions
Before work begins, the Build agreement defines scope, acceptance criteria, a representative baseline, the measurement method, client dependencies, the acceptance period, and any written target. Any remediation is limited to the signed agreement and its conditions.
Ownership and handover
The signed agreement records ownership, source and configuration access, credentials, documentation, hosting responsibilities, third-party accounts, and handover. Least-privilege access and approval rules are agreed for the selected architecture.
Build FAQ
What happens after the Audit.
Do I have to use Yeevy for implementation?
No. Build is optional. The Audit deliverables support an informed decision, whether you proceed with Yeevy, another provider, or no implementation.
How long does a Build take?
Timing depends on scope, system access, integrations, data readiness, testing, and client approvals. The proposal states the delivery plan before work begins.
Does every Build include a guarantee?
Only commitments written into the signed Build agreement apply. It defines the target, baseline, measurement method, dependencies, acceptance period, and applicable remediation.
What happens after launch?
The agreed handover is included. Managed Support is optional and separately scoped when ongoing monitoring, maintenance, or optimization is required.
Our commitment
We put a number on the result — then stand behind it.
The Audit produces an estimate and a recommended way to measure it. On a Build, that may become a written commitment: the target, baseline, measurement method, client dependencies, and acceptance period are defined in the contract — along with the remediation Yeevy provides if the agreed target is not met under those conditions.
Any target and remediation are limited to the conditions in the signed Build agreement. Audit outputs remain estimates, not guaranteed outcomes.
Control and accountability
You keep control of your systems, data, and decisions.
The operating design is agreed before launch. Audit results remain estimates; any Build target and remediation exist only under the conditions of the signed agreement.
- Human approval where risk warrants it
- Sensitive or difficult-to-reverse actions follow approval rules agreed before launch.
- Documented data flows
- We document where data moves and which third-party providers process it for the selected architecture.
- Least-privilege access
- Each automation receives only the permissions required for its confirmed scope.
- Visible errors and exceptions
- Important actions, errors, and exceptions are logged and surfaced under the agreed operating design.
- Tool-neutral recommendations
- We configure existing software when it fits and recommend custom work only where it creates justified value.
- Defined ownership and handover
- Ownership, source access, credentials, documentation, and handover are defined in the signed Build agreement.
Find out whether an Audit is worth it.
In 30 minutes, we will review one workflow, tell you whether it looks suitable for automation, and explain the most sensible next step. If an Audit is not justified, we will say so.
No obligation. Directly with a founder.